NY Times -- FORT HOOD, Tex. -- Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, with a blanket draped over his shoulders and a watch cap pulled low over his dark eyes, listened impassively in recent days as several survivors of his murderous rampage a year ago rose and pointed to him as the gunman who had shot them.
No emotion or hint of the defendant's thoughts flickered across his pale features, as more than two dozen other soldiers and civilians spoke under oath about their struggle to survive in the terrifying minutes after he yelled "Allahu akbar!" -- "God is great" in Arabic -- and started shooting. He sank low in his wheelchair -- he is paralyzed from the waist down after the police shot him to end his shooting attack on Nov. 5 -- and stared intensely at the witnesses. At times he made small, precise notes on a legal pad, but he said nothing to his lawyers....
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, US Army Medical Corps
I find it curious that educated men and women reporting for The Gray Lady (NY Times) can't figure out why Nidal Hasan murdered 14 fellow service members at Ft. Hood Texas. I know it's impolite to claim that it's because he's a Muslim to spite his screams of, "Allah u akbar!" as he gunned down innocent men and women, who, moments before would have considered him a brother-in-arms. One might resort to the Holy Book of Islam, the Qur'an for an answer.
Verse 9:11 means what it means. A Muslim who is killed or who kills fulfilling teachings 9:5, 9:29 and all the other teachings of murder, rape, terror, torture in the Quran ARE GUARANTEED ACCESSION TO AN EVIL PARADISE FILLED WITH FULL BREASTED, LUSTROUS EYED VIRGINS WHO REGENERATE AS VIRGINS AFTER EACH SEX ACT AND WHOM THESE KILLERS AND MURDERERS OF ISLAM CAN SEXUALLY MOLEST FOR ALL ETERNITY.... But I don't think that would be politically correct to quote in the NY Times, would it?
How will the NY Times cope with Major Nidal Hasan, US Army, if he follows the the example of the Times Square bomber and truthfully proclaim his motives? He should lecture the court about how it lacks jurisdiction in the matter, since it is not based on Shariah and God's law. He can carefully explain that since the dead soldiers were infidel dogs there should be no penalty for his killing them. If he is thorough he will make use of legal precedents from Islam, complete with citations from the Qur'an and Hadith. That's what a good Muslim should do in order to anchor his martyrdom.
The NY Times Article goes on:
Staff Sgt. Patrick Zeigler said he thought at first the attack was a training exercise. He froze in disbelief as the laser guide crossed his eyes. Then he was hit.
“It felt like someone hit me in the head with a metal baseball bat,” Sergeant Zeigler said, touching the right side of his head where doctors later had to remove part of his brain. He recalled hitting the floor and crawling desperately across the ground toward the door before passing out. “There was a pool of my own blood on the ground in front of me,” he said.
Major Hasan can become a model to Muslims worldwide by telling the court that as a Jihadi, he merely did what he had been commanded to do by the Qur'an!